![]() Of compositions, is primarily an ingenious expedient for catching an Specific passage I had in mind when I wrote that above sentence: Therefore, on this site, I feel it would be a good idea to reproduce the Still, it was a consciousnessĭecision on my part to yank it from the background into the foreground. Without that text lurking somewhere in my mind. It was impossible for me to write about either Gould or Kremer’s project Gould never performed any of Busoni’s transcriptions, he may have embodiedīusoni’s spirit more than any other pianist since Busoni himself died.Īdmit that I am currently reading that “Sketch of a New Esthetic of Music.” So Least in his own day and, while, as far as I have been able to determine, Responsible for some of the more notorious approaches to performing the compositions of Johann Sebastian Bach, at ![]() Than pedagogical, need to bring Busoni into the picture. What the composer had done and committed to marks on paper. Performance (including his work in recording studios) as an act of rethinking Those efforts led, among otherīusoni’s “Sketch of a New Esthetic of Music,” Gould approached every His thoughts about the music he performed. Missed Gould’s birthday by a day but it is never too late to take on theĬomplexities of Gould’s character while, at the same time, trying to pin down Violinist Gidon Kremer and his Kremerata Baltica chamber orchestra. ![]() Which means I could integration test the cars electrical system, in place, without ever turning the engine over, using a voltmeter.Writing a piece for my national site about the new Nonesuch recordingĪrt of Instrumentation: Homage to Glenn Gould, featuring Integration tests are only about how things are connected. Integration tests are often confused with end to end tests that go through an entire use case. The integration test must fail if the connections between the units are faulty. An integration test is not under an obligation to fail in this case. If a unit is faulty the unit test should fail. You are testing how you put the units together. When you are integration testing you are not testing the units. ![]() It's an idea that can be understood in that manner. A unit is an imaginary box that does things when you do things to it. A unit might be one class or many classes or no classes at all. But this still has nothing to do with classes.Ĭlasses get confused with units and modules all the time. Integration tests are tests free of those restrictions. A unit is a cohesive group of local code. If you can isolate your units you have unit testing. Integration testing is simply testing without requiring isolated units. Reason I'm asking is because integration testing is suppose to make sure our classes integrate together by definitionĬlasses existed long before the idea of integration testing. Is this overkill though? Or should integration testing only be done at the top level? However this implies that we would do testing at N - 1 levels for N levels, since the bottom level does not need to be tested. Reason I'm asking is because integration testing is suppose to make sure our classes integrate together by definition, which means wherever we have an interface we want to test with concrete instances. but at what level do we do integration testing? Do we do a bunch of integration tests at the top level? Or do we do one for each level that accepts an interface? When it comes to integration testing however, we want to make sure everything works as intended. A Car adds its engine by an Engine interfaceĪs such, this makes unit testing easier since we can mock the interfaces and make sure the logic works without spending forever instantiating stuff.CarFactory adds cars by a Car interface.CarCompany adds new factories with a CarFactory interfaces.Now suppose that we have interfaces used for each step, like: As such, a CarCompany owns many CaryFactorys, which in turn makes multiple Cars, which have their own possible Engine types, and those are made up of atomic Parts. Suppose we have a hierarchy like the following, where each thing under it means it is composed of that type: CarCompanyįor everything above, also assume each component has logic associated with it and it's not just a glorified collection.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |